Mark Levin Dissects Implications of Joe Biden Pardoning Hunter Biden

Mark Levin Dissects Implications of Joe Biden Pardoning Hunter Biden

Joe Biden’s pardon of Hunter isn’t about fatherly love – it’s a calculated move to save his own skin.

At a Glance

  • President Biden pardoned his son Hunter for gun and tax charges
  • Mark Levin argues the pardon is to protect Joe Biden, not Hunter
  • The pardon covers potential crimes over an 11-year period
  • Critics highlight double standards in justice system favoring the well-connected
  • Concerns raised about implications for ongoing investigations into Biden family

Biden’s Pardon: A Shield for Hunter or Joe?

Well, folks, it looks like the swamp’s favorite father-son duo is at it again. President Joe Biden, in a move that surprises absolutely no one with two brain cells to rub together, has pardoned his son Hunter. Now, before you break out the tissues for this touching display of paternal affection, let’s cut through the bull and get to the meat of what’s really going on here.

Mark Levin, a voice of reason in this circus we call politics, has laid it out plain and simple. This isn’t about Joe being a doting dad; it’s about Joe covering his own behind. The pardon, which conveniently spans an 11-year period, isn’t just erasing Hunter’s misdeeds. Oh no, it’s potentially scrubbing away any breadcrumbs that might lead back to the big guy himself.

The Convenient Timing of Biden’s Sudden Compassion

Let’s talk timing, shall we? Levin, with the foresight of a political Nostradamus, called this move months ago. He predicted Joe would wait for the sweet spot – that lame-duck period when outgoing presidents suddenly grow a conscience and start handing out pardons like candy on Halloween. And lo and behold, here we are, watching his prophecy unfold like a bad soap opera.

“Of course Joe Biden is going to pardon his son, even if he loses the election. … There’s a period of time between a lame-duck president and when you swear in the new president on Inauguration. He will pardon his son during this break.” – Mark Levin

But here’s where it gets juicy. Levin points out that if this was just about Hunter’s past crimes, why bother? The statute of limitations would have kicked in by now. Unless, of course, there’s more to this story. Something that could implicate dear old dad, perhaps?

The Burisma Connection: More Than Meets the Eye?

Levin doesn’t mince words when he gets to the heart of the matter – Burisma. Remember that little Ukrainian energy company that was just dying to have Hunter on its board? The same one that was at the center of corruption allegations while Joe was playing Vice President? Yeah, that one.


“It depends. If his father successfully concealed his activities and the government comes upon it and learns of those activities, it could be that the statute of limitations runs upon the discovery of the crime, and so Joe Biden wanted to make sure … that he was protected, starting with Burisma.” – Mark Levin

This pardon isn’t just wiping Hunter’s slate clean; it’s potentially shutting down any avenue that could lead investigators to Joe’s doorstep. It’s a preemptive strike against justice, wrapped in the guise of fatherly love. How touching.

A Tale of Two Justice Systems

But let’s zoom out for a second and look at the bigger picture. While Hunter gets his get-out-of-jail-free card, what about the rest of America? What about the whistleblowers like Edward Snowden, who exposed government overreach and now lives in exile? Or Leonard Peltier, an American Indian Movement activist, locked up since the ’70s in a case riddled with inconsistencies?

The message is clear: in Biden’s America, it’s not what you know, it’s who you know. And if daddy’s in the Oval Office, well, you’ve hit the jackpot. This isn’t justice; it’s a slap in the face to every law-abiding citizen who doesn’t have a direct line to the White House.

In the end, this pardon isn’t just about Hunter. It’s about a system that bends over backward for the elite while the rest of us are left to fend for ourselves. It’s about a President who’s more concerned with covering his tracks than upholding the law. And it’s about a family that seems to think they’re above the very rules they’re supposed to enforce.

So, as we watch this farce unfold, remember: in the game of political chess, we’re not even pawns. We’re just spectators, expected to sit quietly as the powerful protect their own. But here’s a thought – maybe it’s time we flipped the board.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR