
Stephen Colbert just publicly exposed his own employer’s capitulation to Trump as Rachel Maddow sounds the alarm on “authoritarian overthrow” fantasies with zero evidence.
At a Glance
- Colbert claims Paramount leadership pressured CBS to avoid negative Trump stories amid a $20 billion lawsuit and pending merger requiring Trump administration approval
- Rachel Maddow, appearing on Colbert’s show, denies experiencing similar pressure at MSNBC despite her continuous anti-Trump commentary
- Maddow dramatically characterized the current situation as “an attempted authoritarian overthrow of the U.S. government” without providing evidence
- 60 Minutes correspondent Scott Pelley suggested CBS News executive Bill Owens resigned due to parent company Paramount’s content supervision related to Trump
- The exchange highlights the left-wing media’s continued obsession with pushing unsubstantiated Trump authoritarianism claims
Media Elites Pushing Baseless “Authoritarianism” Claims
The echo chamber of left-wing media personalities continues its ceaseless drumbeat of Trump “authoritarianism” warnings, with MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow making an appearance on Stephen Colbert’s show to push completely unfounded claims about America’s democratically elected president. While millions of Americans struggle with inflation and border chaos, these coastal elites are busy constructing elaborate fantasies about fascism and authoritarian takeovers that exist solely in their imagination. Maddow, who now only hosts her show on Mondays (probably because even liberal viewers got tired of her Russia conspiracy theories), boldly claimed with zero evidence that “we are in the midst of an attempted authoritarian overthrow of the U.S. government.”
These increasingly desperate claims from leftist media personalities come as Colbert himself made some revealing statements about internal pressure at his own network. While trying to suggest Trump is threatening media independence, Colbert actually exposed how the corporate media machine works when he referenced reports that Paramount Global, CBS’s parent company, is facing pressure amid a massive $20 billion lawsuit filed by Trump over alleged election interference in how CBS’s “60 Minutes” edited an interview with Kamala Harris to shield her from criticism before the election.
Corporate Media’s Trump Derangement Syndrome
During their back-patting session disguised as an interview, Colbert asked Maddow if she had experienced similar pressure from her bosses at MSNBC to soften coverage of Trump. Maddow, who has made a career out of pushing anti-Trump conspiracy theories and doomsaying, predictably claimed she hasn’t faced any pressure despite Trump’s past criticism of her network. This from the woman who spent years convincing viewers that Trump was a Russian asset, only to have Robert Mueller’s investigation completely deflate her narrative. The disconnect between these media elites and everyday Americans couldn’t be more stark.
The real story here is that CBS correspondent Scott Pelley suggested that Paramount’s content supervision increased due to a merger requiring Trump administration approval, which allegedly affected journalistic independence and led to a CBS News executive’s resignation. In other words, the corporate media only cares about “journalistic integrity” when it benefits them politically. When there are real consequences for their biased reporting, suddenly they’re concerned about external pressure. The hypocrisy is astounding but entirely predictable.
Fear-Mongering For Ratings While America Suffers
While Maddow and Colbert exchange dire warnings about America’s supposed descent into fascism, real Americans are facing record inflation, a border crisis, and international conflicts. Maddow’s wild claim that we’re experiencing “an attempted authoritarian overthrow” would be laughable if millions of viewers weren’t taking it seriously. She bases these theatrical warnings on her research into historical fascism detailed in her book—a work that many historians have criticized for its selective reading of history and partisan lens. This is the same Maddow who promised viewers for years that Trump’s collusion with Russia would be exposed any day now.
“We are in the midst of an attempted authoritarian overthrow of the U.S. government,” – Maddow
The irony is completely lost on these media personalities that they continue to freely criticize a supposedly “authoritarian” president without any consequences whatsoever. Maddow’s critical commentary about Trump continues unabated on her program, which seems strange for someone living under an alleged authoritarian regime. In actual authoritarian countries, such criticism would result in imprisonment or worse. The fact that Maddow and Colbert continue their commentary without repercussion is the strongest evidence against their own hysterical claims. But don’t expect them to acknowledge this inconvenient reality—there’s too much money to be made scaring their viewers.