FBI’s New Strategy: Combating Leaks with Polygraphs for Security Enhancement

FBI's New Strategy: Combating Leaks with Polygraphs for Security Enhancement

FBI slaps lie detectors on agents to stop leaking – a practice eerily similar to tactics they claimed to protect America from under Trump.

At a Glance

  • The FBI has begun implementing polygraph tests to identify and stop sources of internal information leaks
  • Attorney General Pam Bondi emphasized the need to punish leakers while claiming to defend press freedom
  • FBI Director Kash Patel cited personal threats resulting from leaked information
  • President Trump characterized some leaks as potentially treasonous
  • Multiple national security agencies including intelligence agencies are investigating leaks

The FBI’s Hypocrisy Machine Goes Into Overdrive

In a stunning display of irony that should leave every American citizen questioning everything, the FBI has begun implementing polygraph tests on its agents and staff to stop internal leaks. The same agency that spent years leaking damaging information about the Trump administration now suddenly believes leaks are a grave national security threat. Funny how that works, isn’t it? When leaks damage conservatives, they’re acts of brave whistleblowing. When leaks might expose the new administration’s actions, they’re treasonous acts requiring lie detector tests.

The Department of Justice has rolled back restrictions on compelling testimony or seizing information from reporters, giving themselves broader power to investigate leaks. Attorney General Pam Bondi, apparently with a straight face, emphasized the importance of identifying and punishing those responsible for improper leaks while simultaneously claiming to defend press freedom. That’s quite the balancing act – punishing leakers while protecting the press that publishes those same leaks.

Personal Threats and Presidential Concerns

FBI Director Kash Patel brought a personal dimension to the leak investigations, revealing he experienced threats due to leaked information. “I can tell you that I have received threats directly as a result of information leaked about me and my family,” Patel stated. “We’re going to make sure that doesn’t happen.” While threats against officials are certainly concerning, one might wonder where this zealous protection was when conservative officials faced similar situations during previous administrations.

President Trump, who experienced perhaps more damaging leaks than any president in modern history, didn’t mince words about the current situation, characterizing some leaks as potentially treasonous and demanding accountability. After years of suffering through anonymous sources and fabricated narratives, his call for stopping leaks carries the weight of personal experience with a weaponized intelligence community. The chickens, as they say, have come home to roost.

A Government-Wide Crackdown

The polygraph initiative extends beyond just the FBI. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem confirmed the use of lie detectors in investigations, reporting FBI leaks specifically related to immigration enforcement actions. Meanwhile, National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard has identified officials who leaked classified information and referred them for prosecution. The comprehensive crackdown suggests the problem of internal resistance to the new administration runs deep throughout the federal bureaucracy.

The most glaring question remains unaddressed: where was this concern about leaks during the past eight years? The bureaucratic state seems to have discovered a sudden, convenient reverence for confidentiality and proper channels now that the political winds have shifted. For those of us who’ve been paying attention, this selective enforcement of leak prevention is just another example of the two-tiered system of justice that has become America’s most shameful open secret.

While national security certainly deserves protection, Americans deserve consistency in how these matters are handled, regardless of which party occupies the White House. The apparent double standard in leak enforcement only deepens the trust deficit between citizens and their increasingly partisan institutions.

​

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR