While U.S. officials halt COVID shots for pregnant women, Canada doubles down on potentially harmful jabs despite the glaring fact pregnant women were excluded from original clinical trials.
At a Glance
- Canada’s National Advisory Committee continues recommending COVID vaccines for pregnant women despite the U.S. halting such recommendations
- Health Canada admits pregnant and breastfeeding individuals were excluded from the original COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials
- U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced the U.S. would no longer recommend COVID vaccines for pregnant women and healthy children
- Canadian health officials claim the vaccines are safe based on post-market surveillance, ignoring mounting evidence of serious adverse effects
- Critics like Dr. Byram Bridle call for halting mRNA vaccinations in children, pregnant women, and breastfeeding mothers until proven safe
The Scientific Gaslighting Continues
In a stunning display of medical stubbornness that borders on malpractice, Canadian health officials are digging in their heels on COVID vaccination recommendations for pregnant women even as their American counterparts finally admit the obvious. The U.S. Health Secretary and CDC have stopped recommending COVID shots for healthy pregnant women and children, a belated but welcome acknowledgment of the uncertainty surrounding these experimental injections. Meanwhile, up north, Canada’s National Advisory Committee on Immunization is bizarrely doubling down, insisting pregnant women continue lining up for shots.
Let’s get real about what’s happening here. Health Canada has openly admitted that pregnant and breastfeeding individuals were completely excluded from the original clinical trials. That’s right – they’re recommending an experimental medical intervention to a vulnerable population that wasn’t even studied before the product hit the market! In what universe does that constitute “following the science”? Yet they have the audacity to claim these shots are “safe” based on post-marketing surveillance – the same surveillance that has identified countless serious adverse events in the general population.
“@SOGCorg also criticized the U.S. vaccine policy shift. In a statement Wednesday, the organization said COVID vaccination remains ‘safe and strongly recommended’ during pregnancy and while breastfeeding.” https://t.co/wpJLgdizQM
— Kelsey MacDonald (@KJMacDo) May 29, 2025
Following the Money, Not the Science
The Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada (SOGC) has the nerve to lecture us about “growing misinformation,” stating that “vaccine decisions, including during pregnancy, be guided by evidence-based science and clinical expertise.” What they conveniently ignore is that the most fundamental principle of evidence-based medicine – properly conducted clinical trials – was completely bypassed for pregnant women. Instead, they were essentially enrolled in an unofficial, unmonitored experiment after the vaccines were already authorized.
“In an age of growing misinformation and disinformation, the SOGC strongly urges that vaccine decisions, including during pregnancy, be guided by evidence-based science and clinical expertise.” – Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada
The official narrative also conveniently overlooks the FDA requiring Pfizer and Moderna to expand warnings about heart disease risks in young men aged 16-25. If the vaccines are causing myocarditis and pericarditis in young men, what other effects might they be having on developing babies that we simply haven’t discovered yet? Dr. Byram Bridle, a voice of reason amid this madness, has called for halting mRNA vaccinations in children, pregnant women, and breastfeeding mothers until proven safe – a basic precautionary approach that somehow became controversial during COVID hysteria.
The Transparent Propaganda Push
Canadian doctors like Darine El-Chaar from The Ottawa Hospital exemplify this dogmatic approach, calling the vaccines “safe” despite inadequate safety studies and dismissing the U.S. policy shift as “lacking scientific evidence.” The irony is staggering. The original approval of these vaccines for pregnant women was what truly lacked proper scientific evidence – not the decision to exercise caution. These are the same medical authorities who insist the vaccines “have more benefits because of pregnant people’s vulnerable immune status.”
“have been well documented to be effective in pregnancy, similar to non-pregnant people, They actually have more benefits because of pregnant people’s vulnerable immune status.” – El-Chaar
What we’re witnessing is a dangerous medical groupthink that places institutional consensus above patient safety. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists expressed “disappointment” with the U.S. policy change – as if safety concerns should take a backseat to maintaining a unified message. This rigid adherence to the initial vaccine narrative, despite mounting evidence of problems and scientific uncertainty, represents everything wrong with how COVID policies have been implemented. When protecting pharmaceutical products becomes more important than protecting patients, we’ve lost our way as a society.
