Former President Donald Trump faces sentencing on January 10 in a case that could make him the first convicted felon to take office as President of the United States.
At a Glance
- Trump’s bid to dismiss the New York hush money case based on presidential immunity was rejected
- Sentencing is set for January 10, shortly before Trump’s expected return to the White House
- Trump was convicted of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records
- Judge Juan Merchan indicated he is not inclined to sentence Trump to prison
- Trump can choose to appear in person or virtually for the sentencing
The Witch Hunt Continues: Trump’s Legal Battle Intensifies
Well, folks, it looks like the left’s relentless crusade against Donald Trump has hit a new level of absurdity. In a move that reeks of political persecution, New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan has set January 10 as the sentencing date for Trump in the so-called “hush money” case. This farce of a trial, which resulted in Trump’s conviction on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records, is nothing short of a direct assault on our Constitution and the very foundations of our republic.
Let’s be clear: this isn’t about justice; it’s about the left’s desperate attempt to derail Trump’s triumphant return to the White House. The timing of this sentencing – mere days before Trump is set to begin his second term – is so blatantly political it would be laughable if it weren’t so dangerous to our democracy.
Presidential Immunity: A Constitutional Crisis in the Making
In a stunning display of judicial overreach, Judge Merchan rejected Trump’s entirely reasonable request to dismiss the case based on presidential immunity and the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause. This decision flies in the face of longstanding legal precedent and common sense. As Trump’s spokesman, Steven Cheung, rightly pointed out:
“Today’s order by the deeply conflicted, Acting Justice Merchan in the Manhattan DA Witch Hunt is a direct violation of the Supreme Court’s Immunity decision and other longstanding jurisprudence.”
Cheung’s words cut to the heart of the matter. This isn’t just about Trump; it’s about the very fabric of our constitutional republic. If a former president can be hounded and persecuted like this, what hope do ordinary citizens have against the tyrannical overreach of the state?
The Farce of “Justice”: No Jail Time, but Maximum Political Damage
In what can only be described as a backhanded acknowledgment of the case’s weakness, Judge Merchan indicated he’s not inclined to sentence Trump to prison. Instead, he’s leaning towards an “unconditional discharge.” But make no mistake, the damage is already done. The left’s goal was never about actual punishment; it was about smearing Trump’s name and creating a cloud of controversy as he prepares to take office once again.
“While this Court as a matter of law must not make any determination on sentencing prior to giving the parties and Defendants, opportunity to be heard, it seems proper at this juncture to make known the Court’s inclination to not impose any sentence of incarceration, a sentence authorized by the conviction but one the People concede they no longer view as a practicable recommendation.”
This mealy-mouthed statement from Judge Merchan is nothing but a thin veil over the political nature of this entire charade. They know they can’t actually put Trump behind bars without causing a national uproar, so they’ll settle for the next best thing: making him the first president to take office with a felony conviction hanging over his head.
The Fight Continues: Trump’s Unwavering Resolve
In the face of this blatant injustice, Trump and his team remain resolute. As Cheung boldly declared:
“There should be no sentencing, and President Trump will continue fighting against these hoaxes until they are all dead.”
This, my friends, is the spirit of a true fighter. Trump isn’t backing down, and neither should we. This case, along with the other politically motivated indictments, represents a dangerous precedent. It’s not just about Trump; it’s about the future of our country and the sanctity of our electoral process.
As we approach January 10, let’s remember what’s really at stake here. This isn’t just about one man or one case. It’s about standing up to the corrupt establishment that would rather destroy a political opponent than face him in a fair fight at the ballot box. Trump’s battle is our battle, and it’s one we can’t afford to lose.
